• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 17 year(s) and 3 month(s) ago

Judge hears arguments in Marblehead development battle

jbutterworth

March 20, 2008 by jbutterworth

MARBLEHEAD – Round 1 began Wednesday morning in the battle over the town’s special permit for a 45-unit condominium development on the Salem-Marblehead line.Boston Land Court Judge Charles Trombly heard oral arguments on a stop-work injunction in the case of Kalis versus KSS Realty Partners and took the matter under advisement. A decision was expected within a week.Kalis is one of eight Robert Road homeowners who filed a Land Court appeal of the special permit the town awarded for 33 market-rate homes and 12 affordable homes under Chapter 40B, on the former Chadwick Lead Mills property. The affected homes overlook the construction site.Kalis sought a court order to prevent any work on the property until National Lead, the present owner, has the property clean-up underway.”I said at least we should stay this until October-November of this year so we know if National Lead is going to do the clean-up,” Kalis said after the hearing. “We’ll see what the judge does. Until the land is cleaned up KSS has no intention of purchasing the property.”National Lead has from Oct. 1 to Feb. 15 to clean the harbor, the first step in their clean-up of the property. If they miss that date they must wait until Oct. 1, 2009 to begin.He is suing KSS, also known as 485 Lafayette Street Acquisitions, and the five Board of Appeals members who voted to grant the permit: William Moriarty, Andrea Papanek, Christopher Casey, David Bennett and Allan Lipkind. Ultimately he wants the decisions of the appeals board and the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency overturned.The appeal charges that the developer “intentionally misrepresented the site” to win approval from the MHFA, stating that the 45 units would be built on 4.4 acres of land in Salem and Marblehead, with a project density of 10.2 units per acre.The plaintiffs say the units will actually be built on 2.8 acres, the Marblehead portion of that site, and that makes the density of the project 15.7 units per acre.King said the MHFA was fully aware of the circumstances when the agency approved the proposal and the clean-up of the property had been approved. He asked the judge to schedule a hearing on the lawsuit.

  • jbutterworth
    jbutterworth

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

Sponsored Content

What questions should I ask when choosing a health plan?

Advertisement

Upcoming Events

#SmallBusinessFriday #VirtualNetworkingforSmallBusinesses #GlobalSmallBusinessSuccess #Boston

July 18, 2025
Boston Masachusset

2025 GLCC Annual Golf Tournament

August 25, 2025
Gannon Golf Club

Adult Color/Paint Time

July 11, 2025
5 N Common St, Lynn, MA, United States, Massachusetts 01902

Adult Sip and Stitch

July 14, 2025
5 N Common St, Lynn, MA, United States, Massachusetts 01902

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group