• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 13 year(s) and 11 month(s) ago

Home, seawall renovations still awaiting final approval

jbutterworth

October 26, 2011 by jbutterworth

MARBLEHEAD – Groom Construction has yet to receive final approval for the renovation of an ocean-side home and the reconstruction and enlargement of a seawall at 15 Spray Ave.The Conservation Commission approved the seawall a month ago – but the state Department of Environmental Protection is due to examine the seawall and Groom?s plans Monday, Nov. 7 to resolve safety questions and wetlands concerns.Groom plans to make the house?s seawall higher to fend off waves and neighbors feared that the new seawall would divert the waves to their property. King said in September that the final plans “minimize any increased risk of storm damage.” Conservation Commission Chairman Walter Haug said two independent consultants offered evidence that the wall design would not affect neighboring properties and the commissioners issued an order of conditions for the work.Attorney Carl King, who represents neighbors of the house, was scheduled to appear before the Board of Appeals Tuesday evening in connection with a dispute between the neighbors and Building Commissioner Robert Ives and his staff.Ives and his staff have ruled that the renovated house at 15 Spray Ave., is existing construction, not new construction.?I think they (figured) it wrong,” King said, stating that new construction would require a variance from the Board of Appeals, since the house exceeds the height and side yard requirements of the Zoning Bylaws.?You can peek through the windows from the street and every piece of wood you see is brand new.”However, after King filed his application to contest the building commissioner?s ruling, Groom modified their plans and Kings and his clients decided not to go forward.Groom and their lawyer, Attorney Paul Lynch, did not attend the hearing. The appeals board unanimously approved King?s request to withdraw without prejudice, meaning that he can bring the appeal forward again if his clients wish.

  • jbutterworth
    jbutterworth

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

Sponsored Content

Buy Instagram Followers: Boost Social Proof With 6 Proven Services

Ketamine Therapy: A Misunderstood Medicine Finds Its Place in Modern Care

Make Flashcards From Any PDF: Simple AI Workflow for Exams

Advertisement

Upcoming Events

“Grace and Enlightenment” at Washington Street Baptist Church

November 1, 2025
Washington Street Baptist Church, Lynn MA

11th Annual Lynn Tech Festival of Trees

November 16, 2025
Lynn Tech Tigers Den

2025 Lydia Pinkham Open Studios – Saturday, November 22

November 22, 2025
271 Western Ave Ste 316, Lynn, MA, United States, Massachusetts 01904

2025 Lydia Pinkham Open Studios – Sunday, November 23

November 23, 2025
271 Western Ave Ste 316, Lynn, MA, United States, Massachusetts 01904

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group