• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 11 year(s) and 4 month(s) ago

Judge denies lawsuit against Saugus board

ktaylor

May 6, 2014 by ktaylor

SAUGUS – A judge has rejected a lawsuit by the former Saugus Community Television Board of Directors seeking to regain control over the public access channel.The SCTV Board of Directors filed a suit against the Saugus Board of Selectmen in April after the selectmen voted 4-1 to dissolve the board for not cooperating with them over writing new regulations for SCTV?s return to a nonprofit. After a hearing last Thursday, Salem Superior Court Associate Justice Timothy Feeley delivered his decision Monday that the SCTV board had no evidence to support its claims.The decision states that the SCTV Board of Directors claimed that selectmen interfered with SCTV?s right of free speech and deprived them of due process through “threats, intimidation and coercion,” and that individual members of the Board of Selectmen acted with “intentional interference with advantageous relations” in voting for the board?s dissolution.Feeley?s decision states that there was no evidence to support that any of the selectmen acted for personal reasons. Feeley also wrote that the complaint was more of a “power battle for control” of the television channel, rather than a battle over political expression, and therefore there was no violation of free speech or due process. Feeley wrote that the court “is not clear that it fully understands all the actions” by the selectmen or the SCTV directors that led to the filing of the suit. The court does understand, wrote Feeley, “this case is about power and control of the (public access) channel,” and that the selectmen control the channel because they represent the town involved in the contract, despite the SCTV board?s assertion to the contrary.Former SCTV Board of Directors Chairman Jim Ravagno could not be reached for comment Monday.

  • ktaylor
    ktaylor

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

Sponsored Content

Make Flashcards From Any PDF: Simple AI Workflow for Exams

Solo Travel Safety Hacks: How to Use eSIM and Tech to Stay Connected and Secure in Australia

How Studying Psychology Can Equip You To Better Help Your Community

Advertisement

Upcoming Events

“WIN” Wine Tasting Mixer at Lucille!

October 9, 2025
Lucille Wine Shop

11th Annual Lynn Tech Festival of Trees

November 16, 2025
Lynn Tech Tigers Den

38 SPECIAL

December 13, 2025
Lynn Auditorium

3FATCATS ROCKTOBER KICK OFF 3FATCATS

October 4, 2025
Monte's Restaurant

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group