• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 2 year(s) and 10 month(s) ago

Municipal meetings will stay hybrid

Emma Fringuelli

July 12, 2022 by Emma Fringuelli

The state legislature is set to extend the provision allowing remote access and participation to municipal meetings, with the provision set to expire this Friday. 

Both the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives have passed bills that would extend the mandate, with the House bill including a provision to mandate remote access for all municipal meetings beginning on April 1, 2023. The bill passed by the senate would extend remote participation to Dec. 15, 2023. 

If the two chambers reconcile these bills, cities and towns across the Commonwealth will need to continue or start providing virtual access to municipal meetings.

For some communities on the North Shore, this new legislation will have very little impact. Remote and hybrid meetings were key for municipal offices’ operations during the pandemic and have offered flexibility since. 

Peabody City Clerk Allyson Danforth said the city has made remote participation a permanent part of meetings, after implementing the option on April 9, 2020. 

Lynn City Clerk Janet Rowe said the city will wait for the legislature’s decision and comply with whatever version of the bill is passed. 

“Most of all our boards used remote participation during COVID and adapted well,” Rowe said.

The Massachusetts Municipal Association says that without setting aside funding in these bills, the mandate included in the House bill could put a burden on local governments who aren’t tech savvy. 

“Every city and town in the Commonwealth has dozens of councils, boards, and commissions, which hold numerous public meetings a year. The final House bill would impact thousands of local public bodies. The costs of technology, equipment, staff and necessary space to run all of these public meetings … in a hybrid fashion is simply untenable,” the organization said in a statement. 

“Municipalities have been dedicated to continuing this access and MMA recognizes the intent and goal of virtual access and participation by the public, yet the path to achieving the House’s goal is steep and complex. An expansive and expensive mandate at this time is not realistic and would undermine the thoughtful work by municipalities to propel this essential work forward,” the statement said. 

Emma Fringuelli can be reached at [email protected].

  • Emma Fringuelli

    Emma Fringuelli is a Staff Photographer and writer for Essex Media Group. She was born and raised in Lynn and is a Smith College alumna. She holds a B.A. in English Literature and Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies. When she is not in the newsroom, you can find her reading the literature of Nikolai Gogol. Follow her on Twitter @emmafringuelli.

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

RELATED POSTS:

No related posts.

Sponsored Content

What questions should I ask when choosing a health plan?

Advertisement

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group