• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 1 year(s) and 7 month(s) ago

Residents unhappy with new school facility use fee

Vishakha Deshpande

October 25, 2023 by Vishakha Deshpande

LYNNFIELD — The School Committee discussed Lynnfield High School’s new policy, which charges the public $150 per hour for the use of its gym and basketball courts, at its meeting.

Jim Crawford, who lives in the town, was in attendance and spoke against the School Committee’s previous decision to implement the policy. Crawford, who has been playing pick-up basketball at the school’s gym for the past decade, said residents are not happy with the new policy. 

“I have met up with various groups of guys over the years that I have played basketball with in high school and there’s never been any fees involved,” Crawford said. “There’s not one person I’ve spoken with, and I’ve spoken to a lot, who agrees with this policy or thinks this was a good policy.”

School Committee Chair Rich Sjoberg said that the fees fall under a new rental-agreement policy and are intended to help the school fund facility upgrades. The School Committee had voted in favor of the fee in spring.

“In the spring we had discussions regarding the new school-rental fees as a source of revenue to help lessen the tax burden of the town,” Sjoberg said. “And I wish I would have heard from some of the residents who were unhappy with the policy in the spring when this was being discussed over a several-month period.”

Crawford also touched on the raises being given to the superintendent and assistant superintendent of schools — a decision made earlier this month.

“You guys are claiming that there is a budget shortfall,” Crawford said during the meeting last week. “Now you’re charging town residents for public use for buildings they’re already paying for through taxes, and at the same time you are also making a very rare move of giving raises when it’s not contract-renewal time.”

Sjoberg attributed the raises to wanting to have a consistent foundation of leadership in the district and at the schools.

“During our review of the superintendent’s contract, it came to our attention that in the last year, there were 52 superintendent positions open in the state and the lowest salary being offered to a brand new superintendent was $204,000 — $11,000 more than what Lynnfield is offering its current superintendent,” Sjoberg said. “It was our thought that it would be not only fair to give a raise to the superintendent, but would also help provide consistency in leadership.”

At the end of the meeting’s discussion, Crawford requested that the committee review and reconsider the new policy, which it agreed to do.

  • Vishakha Deshpande
    Vishakha Deshpande

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

RELATED POSTS:

No related posts.

Sponsored Content

What questions should I ask when choosing a health plan?

Advertisement

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group