• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 1 year(s) and 6 month(s) ago
According to a release from Acting United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Joshua Levy, GEA paid $9,413,024 to resolve allegations that the Lynn plant sold parts to the U.S. Army and Navy that were either not properly inspected or non-conforming. (Julia Hopkins) Purchase this photo

GE Aerospace pays $9 million for alleged violations at Lynn plant

James Bartlett

November 8, 2023 by James Bartlett

LYNN — GE Aerospace paid more than $9 million to resolve allegations of False Claims Act violations stemming from its manufacturing plant in the city.

According to a press release from Acting United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Joshua Levy, GEA paid $9,413,024 to resolve allegations that the Lynn plant sold parts to the U.S. Army and Navy that were either not properly inspected or non-conforming.

The release said GEA admitted that at times, from 2012 to 2019, it did not conduct required parts inspections and sold engines containing parts that did not meet the requirements of the U.S. military.

“The provision of non-conforming parts for Department of Defense aircraft engines could pose a substantial threat to warfighter safety and readiness,” Greg Gross, who is the special agent in charge for the Naval Criminal Investigative Service’s Economic Crimes Field Office, said.

GEA Lynn is specifically alleged to have not consistently used functional gauges to inspect features on certain parts from 2014 to 2017, omitted at least two inspections of curvy features on certain part numbers from 2014 to 2018, and sold engines to the Army and Navy that contained unallowable metal fragments from 2014 to 2019.

“GE Aerospace failed to follow important inspection requirements on engines it sold to the military,” Levy said. “These rules exist for a reason – making sure the men and women we depend upon to protect our national security have the highest quality equipment.”

GE Aerospace Media Relations Manager Mandy Mayfield said there was no impact on the safety of the aircraft involved and pointed out that in the agreement, GEA was credited under the Department of Justice’s guidelines for taking disclosure, cooperation, and remediation into account in False Claims Act cases.

“Safety is our top priority. Upon learning of these issues more than five years ago, we alerted the Department of Defense and cooperated with the government’s investigation,” Mayfield said. “While these issues had no impact on the safety of the aircraft involved, we implemented significant corrective actions to ensure this does not occur again.”

  • James Bartlett

    James is a reporter and photographer covering Lynn. He has previously covered Lynnfield and Peabody for The Item. His work has been featured in GBH News, boston.com, WHDH.com and The Suffolk Journal.

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

RELATED POSTS:

No related posts.

Sponsored Content

What questions should I ask when choosing a health plan?

Advertisement

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group