• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
Itemlive

Itemlive

North Shore news powered by The Daily Item

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Police/Fire
  • Government
  • Obituaries
  • Archives
  • E-Edition
  • Help
This article was published 7 months ago

Wooldridge: Nanny states are now essential to economic health

Guest Commentary

October 3, 2024 by Guest Commentary

Adrian Wooldridge

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the rulers of the industrial world started to worry about the health of the people. National governments discovered that military recruits were too unfit to serve. City governments worried that slums were spreading disease. Corporations realized that poor health was reducing productivity.

Policymakers tore up the old laissez faire playbook — leave health to the individual — and generated a dizzying variety of innovative policies. Governments, starting with Bismarck’s Germany, introduced compulsory health insurance. Schools embraced “open air classrooms.” Companies created work-based football teams to encourage their employees to get fit: Arsenal was spawned by the Woolwich Royal Arsenal Factory in 1886 and West Ham by the Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Company, in 1895. Entrepreneurs such as John Harvey Kellogg invented health-promoting foods. Teddy Roosevelt turned the White House basement into a gym, complete with boxing ring, and created five new national parks.

It is time for today’s policymakers to treat health with the same combination of urgency and fresh thinking. In Britain and the United States, a 200-year trend for people to live longer and healthier lives is in danger of dead-ending. Everywhere obesity is swelling to epidemic proportions: A 2019 OECD study found that the cost of high obesity rates to health services globally is $990 billion a year, with obesity costing an average of 3.3% of GDP in the OECD as a whole and 5.3% in Mexico.

We need to tear up the key assumptions that have governed health thinking in recent decades: that health care is about fixing broken people rather than promoting well-being; that the government’s responsibility for health care is exhausted so long as it provides services marked “health”; that nanny statism is a bad thing; and that food companies should be left to make money regardless of the costs they impose on society. We also need to launch an age of experiment in which we explore the power of a wide range of institutions to promote better health.

Some promising experiments have already begun. National health services in both Japan and South Korea have discovered the power of what management gurus call “stretch targets”: setting ambitious targets for improving health and encouraging a wide range of institutions to help reach them. Health services are also learning the power of “place-based policies” to address regions with particularly bad health outcomes. In the early 1970s, North Karelia province in Finland introduced a suite of policies — from lifestyle coaching to improved drug treatment for hypertension — to address its high rate of cardiovascular mortality. The policy was so successful, with coronary disease falling by 84% from 1972 to 2014, that it was rolled out nationally.

Governments have demonstrated the power of both taxes and labeling to improve behavior. In 2016, Britain’s then chancellor, George Osborne, announced that he would impose a sugar tax levy on soft drinks. The results were encouraging: Soft drink producers reduced the sugar content of their drinks by an average of 35.4%, a change that may explain the stabilization of obesity rates in the latest National Health Service annual health survey. In the same year Chile, where three-quarters of the adult population were obese, introduced a new front-of-package warning label (a black octagon) on foods that contained added sugar, sodium or added fats. The scheme was so successful that it spread across Latin America. Both Hungary and Mexico have gone even further, introducing comprehensive taxes on unhealthy food, with sales of the products subjected to the tax in Hungary falling by a quarter.

Companies are also discovering the power of “nudges” to encourage healthier behavior among their employees. The most innovative company here is arguably the South-Africa based insurer Discovery Ltd. Discovery has invented a health-care program, Vitality, which uses an air-miles type system to reward its customers for healthy behavior: You can move up from one level to another and accumulate rewards that can be used on gym membership, healthy food or exotic holidays.

Adrian Wooldridge is the global business columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A former writer at the Economist, he is author of “The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World.”

  • Guest Commentary
    Guest Commentary

    View all posts

Related posts:

No related posts.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisement

RELATED POSTS:

No related posts.

Sponsored Content

What questions should I ask when choosing a health plan?

Building Customer Loyalty Through Personalized Shopping Experiences

Advertisement

Footer

About Us

  • About Us
  • Editorial Practices
  • Advertising and Sponsored Content

Reader Services

  • Subscribe
  • Manage Your Subscription
  • Activate Subscriber Account
  • Submit an Obituary
  • Submit a Classified Ad
  • Daily Item Photo Store
  • Submit A Tip
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions

Essex Media Group Publications

  • La Voz
  • Lynnfield Weekly News
  • Marblehead Weekly News
  • Peabody Weekly News
  • 01907 The Magazine
  • 01940 The Magazine
  • 01945 The Magazine
  • North Shore Golf Magazine

© 2025 Essex Media Group