To the editor:
I am responding to the “I want a real choice in state elections” letter in the Sept. 3 edition of The Daily Item.
I, too, would like to see more choices of candidates in both parties. However, when you look at some of the basic problems, several issues come to mind.
One is the long-standing problem of gerrymandering districts to benefit the party in power. Gerrymandering dates back to Gov. Elbridge Gerry in 1811-12, when his party drew districts to serve Republicans. The largest district then was on the North Shore. A Boston newspaper in March 1812 stated the outline looked like a large salamander. Hence the term “gerrymandering,” first used by The Boston Gazette.
Another problem is politicians who stay in office too long, gaining too much control and wealth in their positions. Then there are those who act as if they are kings.
Both parties are to blame for no longer running candidates who truly care about citizens, instead focusing only on themselves.
Several solutions come to mind: do away with gerrymandering and establish term limits at both the federal and state levels. Good luck trying to get either one.
I have been a registered voter since 1965 and have seen attempts over the years to eliminate both. They are still with us: gerrymandering and no term limits, at least in this state.
Respectfully,
John S. Norton
Lynn
